However, we are concerned that the breadth of the court's opinion will complicate efforts to resolve the conflict,
Belgium will always stand up for the respect of international law.”
We want to see concrete steps taken by Israel to cease the expansion of settlements to respond to extremist activity,
We have been clear that Israel's program of government support for settlements is both inconsistent with international law and obstructs the cause of peace,
This opinion has addressed the aspiration of Indonesia and the rest of the international community in delivering justice for the Palestinians,
Indonesia invites the international community and the UN to jointly act on the advisory opinion and recognize the existence of the State of Palestine,
Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and the regime associated with them, have been established and are being maintained in violation of international law,
The Jewish nation cannot be an occupier in its own land,
No aid. No assistance. No complicity. No money, no arms, no trade...no actions of any kind to support Israel's illegal occupation,
A just and enduring peace will require the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people to self-determination to be realised,
We respect the independence of the court and its critical role in upholding international law and the rules-based order,
The ICJ has no enforcement powers of its own, and it is now up to the international community – that is, governments – to pressure Israel to dismantle its apartheid regime and its illegal settlements, put an end to decades of systemic oppression, and restore justice for Palestinians,
It is possible to invest in peace and security instead of occupation,
The ICJ ruling renews hope among our people for a future free from colonisation."
Israel is under an obligation to end this illegal colonial enterprise unconditionally, and in our view, that means immediately and totally,
The State of Israel is under the obligation to bring an end to its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible,
Unfortunately, the Court’s opinion is fundamentally wrong,
The opinion is completely detached from the reality of the Middle East: While Hamas, Iran and other terrorist elements are attacking Israel from seven fronts … with the aim of obliterating it, and in the aftermath of the greatest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, the opinion ignores the atrocities that took place on October 7, as well as the security imperative of Israel to defend its territory and its citizens,
It should be emphasized that the opinion is blatantly one-sided,
The PA a long time ago took a position that it is all about the two-state solution and ending occupation, so their entire discourse has just been about that,