I think it turns into a rebalancing of certain trade agreements over time. I think that rebalancing can be constructive for U.S. growth if it’s handled right,
I look at tariffs, they’re an economic tool, That’s it,
Tariffs can change the dollar, but the most important thing is growth,
If it’s a little inflationary, but it’s good for national security, so be it. I mean, get over it,
In the United States and many other developed economies, consumers have enjoyed cheaper products as a result [of imports]—but their manufacturers have struggled to compete."
In terms of foreign trade, we don't seek trade surplus; we want to import more competitive quality products and services to promote balanced trade,
Americans benefit from and deserve an America first trade policy. Therefore, I am establishing a robust and reinvigorated trade policy that promotes investment and productivity, enhances our nation's industrial and technological advantages, defends our economic and national security, and—above all—benefits American workers, manufacturers, farmers, ranchers, entrepreneurs, and businesses."
I would be, if he wanted to buy it. I’d like Larry to buy it, too.”
Apart from her inappropriate statements, the service was a very boring and uninspiring one,
We’re talking about a tariff of 10 per cent on China, based on the fact that they’re sending fentanyl to Mexico and Canada,
If we take a step back and look at what's enveloping this whole discussion on tariffs, it's about global supply chains,
Smaller players will trade hard and fast and try to jump on the back of these moves very quickly,
You could look at this any which way, right? Is February 1 the open question, or is it the tariffs themselves,
We're thinking in terms of 25 percent on Mexico and Canada, because they're allowing vast numbers of people -- Canada's a very bad abuser also -- vast numbers of people to come in, and fentanyl to come in,
Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens,
The concentration of power by Trump is unprecedented in recent U.S. history. He may be the only one China can speak to from a practical perspective,
Trump wants a deal. Otherwise, he would have shot up China on day one,
We will see whether the U.S. will return to a more pragmatic and rational state, so that both sides can further enhance China-U.S. relations and return to the track of healthy, stable and sustainable development,
Trump is a businessman at heart, his considerations are more pragmatic, he is not interested in ideology,
Other problems, like geopolitical issues, the Taiwan question, are all secondary to Trump,