I have the unique constitutional responsibility for the national security of the United States, the conduct of foreign policy, and other vital executive functions,
We may have to get an approval from China too. I’m not sure. But I’m sure they’ll approve it. If they don’t approve it, it would be somewhat of a hostile act, I think.”
TikTok is one poker chip in the broader game of high-stakes poker between China and the US,
Why would I want to get rid of TikTok?”
I would like the United States to have a 50% ownership position in a joint venture,
I'm not going to be the decision maker there. You know, this is President Trump's deal now it's in his ... administration, and you know, it will all get sorted out,
I'm okay with whatever is legal … and the U.S. government is OK with,
So if Project Liberty, or anybody else ... buys U.S. Tiktok and does a poor job, the underlying technology will allow that whole user base to go to a different app that's doing a better job,
We're not flexible about the values and principles of Project Liberty, right?"
We’ll get on with it, as soon as maybe the end of the week in terms of negotiating what might work… The Chinese government, the US government and the company and the board all have to be involved in this conversation,
The president does not have the power to suspend the law, that’s not a presidential power. And so to the extent that Trump is saying the law is not enforced, no one’s violating it – those are not legally meaningful statements,
It’s not clear to me that any member of Congress would be likely to sue Donald Trump,
I really imagine that for these companies that it’s really just a cost-benefit analysis about it’s either worth it or not to engage in activity that’s subjecting me to some level of risk that my lawyers are informing me of,
At the same time, companies that are violating the law are still violating the law. So they are still at risk of pretty substantial legal exposure,
Often, the problem with non-enforcement is it’s removing legal burdens instead of imposing them. So people in some sense are benefited rather than hurt,
Companies that choose not to comply are thinking, ‘There’s some risk that the executive order could be rescinded, they could come after me,
There’s then a second question, which is, courts are often reluctant to review enforcement choices,
The unfortunate timing of section 2(a) of the Act — one day before I took office as the 47th President of the United States — interferes with my ability to assess the national security and foreign policy implications of the Act’s prohibitions before they take effect,
I tell you what. Every rich person has called me about TikTok."
It would be somewhat of a hostile act" if Beijing rejected an arrangement