Nowhere in its papers does the government defend the legality of canceling the education grants at issue here,

It is beyond puzzling that a majority of justices conceive of the government’s application as an emergency,

It is a mistake for the court to grant this emergency application,

The plaintiffs face termination without any suggestion of wrongdoing or poor performance,

These radical judges will soon learn that denying the Chief Executive his constitutionally granted authorities is a gross infringement of the law and will not stand on appeal,

The harms that will result from permitting the department to reinstate these terminations are directly contrary to Congress's goals in enacting the (programs) and in entrusting the department with their implementation,

This application should have been denied for numerous obvious and independent reasons,

The aim is clear: to stop the executive branch in its tracks and prevent the administration from changing direction on hundreds of billions of dollars of government largesse that the executive branch considers contrary to the United States’ interests and fiscal health,

If respondents ultimately prevail, they can recover any wrongfully withheld funds through suit in an appropriate forum,

Reinstating the challenged grant-termination policy will inflict significant harm on grantees — a fact that the Government barely contests,

Only this court can right the ship — and the time to do so is now.”

Ending the bigotry of DEI and ensuring the federal government runs efficiently might be a crime to Democrats, but it’s in line with the law,