However, if it were the only interview that Musk conducted with German parties then, by failing to give equal prominence to all mainstream views or promoting one party in a polarising manner, it may be that lawmakers perceive X and Musk have negatively affected civic discourse and the electoral process in Germany by only interviewing the AfD or failing to have an effective third party real-time moderator,
Therefore we can indeed speak of political advertising in this case, because the Platform X usually sells this kind of reach for a lot of money,
This could potentially include disabling the recommendation algorithm of X until the federal election,
Don't feed the troll,
If he uses this treatment to support the AfD via political statements and livestreams showcasing their candidate, this could easily violate the DSA,
The [European Commission] can request messages that are publicly posted on Slack,
That already places significant obstacles to transparency, and if there’s not enough transparency, there cannot be enough accountability,
The Commission could look at whether Alice Weidel, or any other user for that matter, received a so-called power user multiplier score in its recommendation algorithms,
What I’m trying to find out is if Musk is using a large information platform that he owns in ways which could diminish the freedom of speech of others, by hard-coding a multiplier into his own reach,
There will be a number of expert organizations who have the capacity regarding data scraping and data analysis [that] will be probably following [the event],
How much is [it] or will it be boosted? This is what the Commission will be looking at,
In the first survey we conducted this year, we found that this has not yet benefited the AfD,
Yes! You are perfectly right!”
Why is there such a negative reaction from some about AfD?”
There is a spread of disinformation and so much illegal content and these platforms are not respecting the DSA and our rules. So I think the Commission could do more in the framework that we have given them as legislators.”
I don’t understand why people believe that free speech is not affected by the concentration of opinion-making power in the hands of the few. For me, that has rather illiberal, autocratic tendencies, rather than liberal tendencies, when one voice is so much more powerful than all the others.”
We will not allow anyone to use the name of Catalonia to spread hate speech.”
Nothing in the DSA prohibits such a live stream,
We are talking about a private business and we need to make sure our position is well founded,
Is it fair that one person can adjust his algorithms in a way that makes him and his politics and opinions more prevalent than others? Is it OK? Is it risky? Is it in line with the DSA?”