By the way, this is the same judge, this judge is the one who was there eight years ago with the whole FISA court Russia bologna. This is the judge that allowed the crazy dossier to be used as a basis for going to spy on a presidential campaign — President Trump’s campaign,
These guys are here illegally, and they are not Boy Scouts. They are really bad guys. And this judge says, 'No, no, no. Bring them back here. I got to check it out,'
We plan to have hearings starting next Tuesday on this broad subject where we look at some of these, what I would simply call, ridiculous orders,
The bias Judge Boesberg has already demonstrated toward President Donald Trump and his administration is unmistakable.It is not a random act that Boesberg has the case and I don’t expect him to recuse himself, but that would be the best arrangement for the integrity of the court,
It was a mistake that a reporter was inadvertently added to a signal chat with high-level national security principles, having a policy discussion about imminent strikes against the Houthis and the effects of the strike,
This is another example of improper judicial political advocacy. The judicial system must not be weaponized any further to attempt to distract Americans from the amazing work of this Administration and our commitment to our National Security,
With [Boasberg's] prior outrageous rulings under review by the Circuit Court, I don’t think it is wise to allow him more Trump injunction cases,
Generally, agencies ensure retention of messages sent on apps like Signal by setting policies requiring officials and personnel to forward them to official systems for proper archival or take other steps to preserve their content,
The government’s not being terribly cooperative at this point, but I will get to the bottom of whether they violated my order,
We certainly dispute the Nazi analogy,
This has all been done in secret,
The president has to comply with the Constitution and the laws like anyone else,
You could have filed the exact same complaint you filed here in Texas district court,
The public also has a significant stake in the Government's compliance with the law,
It is well-settled (in law) that an oral directive is not enforceable as an injunction,
These removals both complied with the law and safeguarded Americans against members of a foreign terrorist organization. The Government will continue to defend the removals before this Court and, if necessary, on appeal challenging this Court's two injunctions issued on March 15,
That applies in our criminal justice system where the courts are playing their traditional role of protecting the rights of American citizens,
Even where it’s appropriate for the court to play its traditional role of safeguarding the liberties of American citizens, we have this phenomena of nation-wide injunctions where the lowest level judge, district judges, try to bind the entire nation and bind the president in their initial decision. That is not what we have meant by the judicial power under our Constitution,
Nazis got better treatment under the Alien Enemy Act than has happened here,
There’s a pattern whereby these district court judges are trying to usurp the responsibility of the president in the national security area,