Quotes
It is clear that Russia is using the threat of a nuclear disaster as a major military lever to defeat Ukraine. But by undertaking the attacks Russia is risking a nuclear catastrophe in Europe, which is comparable to Fukushima in 2011, Chernobyl in 1986 or even worse.”
Shaun Burnie, nuclear expert at Greenpeace Ukraine, said
The missiles recently used by Ukraine are also an indication of the potential or possible consequences. These are not positive developments,
Erdoğan added
We can never say that a war where nuclear weapons are used can result in anything positive,
the Turkish president repliedEnforcing a no-fly zone or deploying combat troops to Ukraine would bring NATO forces into direct conflict with Russia. This would significantly escalate the war and lead to more human suffering and destruction for all countries involved."
NATO explained why it has not sent troops to Ukraine
.jpg)
Each new attack by Russia only confirms Putin’s true intentions. He wants the war to continue. Talks about peace are not interesting to him. We must force Russia to a just peace by force,
Zelenskyy said
There are certain limits for the chancellor (Olaf Scholz),
a spokesperson for the German government said to reporters on MondayPresident Trump is exactly right about this — the alliance is stronger when Western European countries step up to the plate,
he said
I don't believe that he's a man that usually walks away,
he saidMy criticism of Biden is the same as every other conservative and supporter of Trump — which is that the Biden administration slow walked this,
he saidI don't like it and I take it all very seriously, but the decision is not ours. The decision is being forced upon us by Putin — by the dictator,
he saidWe will use every day of our term to pursue policy interests that we believe are in the interests of the American people,
he saidI don’t think we should take the idea that Russia might use a nuclear weapon, especially in a country where they’re winning, very seriously however.”
Another scare tactic could be nuclear threats, but Dan cautions
At the end, I achieved the most important thing for me, because this day arrived and I am in peace that I gave all that I had,
said NadalI think they’ll try and adopt some scary rhetoric to try and affect US public opinion,
Dan saysCold snap … and bills go up again”.
The Metro splashes on a “Chilling blow” sayingEach of these weapons comes along months, maybe years, after Ukrainians asked for them. It’s quite an agonising process,
Dan saysUK expected to follow US in letting Kyiv use missiles to attack Russia
is the headline on the Guardian’s front-page leadFarmers must pay up for the NHS,
that’
It's another step up the escalation ladder and nobody knows where this is going,
Mike Waltz, Trump's choice to be national security adviser, told Fox News
The longer Ukraine can strike, the shorter the war will be,
Sybiga told reporters ahead of a U.N. Security Council meeting to mark 1,000 days since Russia's full invasion